1.3: Good practices of modelling#
Following the modelling cycle is necessary, but it does not by itself make a model good. Whether the work holds up depends on a few habits that are easy to skip under time pressure and that separate rigorous modelling from careless modelling [1][2].
This section covers four of those practices:
Judging a model by its fitness for purpose, not by whether it is “true” or “complete”.
The KISS and KIDS strategies, and how to choose between them.
The recurring mistakes that catch even experienced modellers.
A practical checklist for making results others can recreate.
Before moving on, preview the working habit behind each of these four areas:
These four practices are not arbitrary: they are distilled from established simulation methodology, principally Railsback and Grimm on parsimony and analysis [1] and Law on verification, validation, and replication [2]. One further practice, documentation, is deferred rather than covered here: writing a model up in a standard format, using the ODD and ODD+D protocols, is treated in Chapter 5, where empirical and decision-focused modelling is discussed in detail.
Key takeaways#
Key takeaways
A sound modelling cycle still depends on fitness for purpose, appropriate detail, explicit checks, and reproducible evidence.
Good practice is a set of habits applied throughout the study, not a final check added after the model is built.
Documentation becomes part of model quality because it lets another reader understand, assess, and rerun the work.
Begin with 1.3.1: What makes a model “good”?, which sets out what it means for a model to be “good” in the first place.